As Wyoming’s 68th Legislature begins its work, new and returning lawmakers face the critical task of shaping policies that can either propel the state forward or lead to unintended setbacks.
The importance of thoughtful and well-informed decision-making has never been more evident, especially given the number of first-time legislators in the House.
Wyoming’s legislature must strike a delicate balance between pursuing new ideas and safeguarding against the potential consequences of hasty decisions. While many lawmakers are driven by a desire to enact rapid change, they must recognize that governing is a complex process that requires careful consideration and engagement with diverse viewpoints.
Effective lawmakers are those who understand that small changes to the law can have far-reaching consequences. Good legislative practice involves listening to expert opinions, soliciting public input, and evaluating whether a bill’s benefits outweigh any potential downsides. Poor legislative practices, on the other hand, prioritize political point-scoring over meaningful governance.
A prime example is the recent push for a bill aimed at restricting state investments in “environmental, social, and governance” (ESG) funds. Although this may resonate with constituents concerned about ideological influences in investing, Wyoming already avoids ESG-focused funds. The initial version of the bill threatened to severely undermine the state’s nearly $30 billion in investments, with potential losses of over $1 billion over three years for the Wyoming Retirement System alone. Fortunately, amendments softened the bill’s most detrimental provisions.
The situation underscores the importance of diligence in lawmaking. Lawmakers must prioritize practical solutions over symbolic gestures to avoid costly consequences for Wyoming residents.
Another contentious issue facing legislators is property tax relief. While Wyomingites understandably desire lower taxes, lawmakers must tread carefully. Across-the-board property tax cuts may offer short-term relief but can have serious long-term consequences for government services and infrastructure.
Property taxes fund essential functions like police and fire services, infrastructure maintenance, and public schools. Broad cuts without a clear plan for offsetting revenue could lead to reduced public safety, diminished services, and neglected infrastructure. Furthermore, Wyoming’s constitution requires adequate funding for certain government functions, including education. Failure to maintain sufficient revenue streams could force future tax hikes, including the introduction of a state income tax.
Legislators must approach tax policy with precision, weighing short-term gains against long-term stability. Thoughtful solutions may be more challenging to craft but are essential for Wyoming’s future prosperity.
The influx of new lawmakers, many aligned with socially conservative ideologies, brings fresh energy to the legislature. However, governing requires more than enthusiasm—it demands experience, knowledge, and collaboration.
Seasoned legislators have voiced concerns about the pace and focus of legislative debates. Experienced representatives like Rep. Steve Harshman (R-Casper) and Rep. Lloyd Larsen (R-Lander) have emphasized the need for careful deliberation to avoid repeating past mistakes. The history and context of previous legislation are invaluable resources for guiding current debates.
House Speaker Rep. Chip Neiman (R-Hulett), a member of the Wyoming Freedom Caucus, acknowledges the importance of debate but also warns against what he perceives as filibustering tactics that slow the legislative process. Striking a balance between thorough deliberation and legislative efficiency is a challenge that the new cohort must navigate.
With input from Wyo File,Wyoming Public Media, and News Letter Journal.
