Wyoming legislators tackled two contentious issues this week: a proposed ban on cellphone use in schools and a revived effort to repeal gun-free zones, sparking debates over local control, safety, and the role of state intervention.
The Wyoming Senate voted down Senate File 21, a bill that would have required local school boards to implement policies restricting cellphone use during instructional time. The bill, defeated by a 17-11 vote, aimed to address concerns like cyberbullying and classroom disruptions.
Co-sponsor Sen. Wendy Schuler, R-Evanston, a former teacher, argued the legislation was necessary to combat issues such as increased student anxiety and depression caused by phone usage. The bill would not have dictated specific policies but would have mandated that districts establish their own rules, with exceptions for emergencies.
However, opponents raised questions about the need for state involvement. Senate President Bo Biteman, R-Ranchester, suggested that existing disciplinary measures, such as confiscating phones, should suffice. Sen. Bob Ide, R-Casper, contended that managing technology access is a parental responsibility.
Supporters like Sen. Larry Hicks, R-Baggs, highlighted instances where parents’ insistence on constant phone access for their children disrupted classrooms. He criticized school boards for failing to support teachers who sought restrictions, arguing that state legislation was necessary to back educators.
Despite these arguments, the bill failed to gain enough support, leaving the issue of cellphone use in schools to local districts.
Meanwhile, the Wyoming House Judiciary Committee voted 8-1 to advance House Bill 172, a measure that would repeal most gun-free zones, including in schools and other public buildings. The bill, a revival of similar legislation vetoed by Gov. Mark Gordon last year, has reignited debates over safety and local governance.
Supporters of the bill, led by Speaker Pro Tempore Jeremy Haroldson, R-Wheatland, argued that gun-free zones make schools and other public spaces vulnerable to attacks. They emphasized the importance of self-defense rights, with Rep. Gary Brown, R-Cheyenne, asserting that such rights are divinely granted and constitutionally protected.
Opponents, including educators and students, raised concerns about the potential risks of allowing concealed weapons in schools. Michelle Escudero, a former school board member, stressed the need for rigorous training and background checks for anyone carrying firearms in educational settings. Students also testified against the bill, expressing fears for their safety.
Critics also highlighted the bill’s limitations on local authority. Rep. Elissa Campbell, R-Casper, argued that the legislation undermines the ability of cities, counties, and school districts to regulate firearms in their own facilities.
Proponents, however, emphasized broader safety concerns. Sen. Lynn Hutchings, R-Cheyenne, noted her personal experiences with threats and said the bill would extend protection beyond schools to all public buildings not explicitly exempted by state law.
The bill now heads to the House floor for further debate and requires two additional approvals before moving to the Senate.
Gillette News Record, Jackson Hall News&Guide, and Buffalo Bulletin contributed to this report.
