x
Science USA

Understanding Space Traffic and the Threat of Cascading Collisions in Orbit

Understanding Space Traffic and the Threat of Cascading Collisions in Orbit
Alan Dyer / VWPics / Universal Images Group / Getty Images
  • PublishedDecember 31, 2024

In November, the International Space Station (ISS) narrowly avoided a potentially catastrophic collision with a piece of space debris, CNN reports.

This incident highlighted the growing risk posed by spaceborne debris, a danger that some experts believe signals the early stages of a scenario known as Kessler Syndrome. But what is Kessler Syndrome, and why does it concern scientists and space policy experts?

Kessler Syndrome is a theoretical chain reaction in which debris from a collision in Earth’s orbit triggers subsequent collisions, creating more debris and escalating the problem exponentially. This concept was first proposed in 1978 by NASA scientist Donald Kessler. In its most extreme form, Kessler Syndrome could render Earth’s orbit so congested with debris that it would be difficult—or even impossible—to operate satellites or safely launch new spacecraft.

The reality of such a scenario is more complex. While the dramatic depiction of Kessler Syndrome in films like Gravity might unfold within minutes, real-world consequences would likely develop over years or decades. Despite this slower timeline, the risks are significant and demand immediate attention.

The ISS’s November maneuver to avoid debris is not an isolated event. Since its first occupancy in 2000, the station has adjusted its orbit dozens of times to sidestep potential collisions. Experts attribute the growing risk to several factors, including:

  • Proliferation of Satellites: The rapid increase in satellite launches, such as SpaceX’s Starlink constellation, has exponentially increased the number of objects in orbit.
  • Past Collisions and Explosions: Incidents like the 2009 collision between a defunct Russian satellite and a US communications satellite have added thousands of trackable pieces of debris to Earth’s orbit.
  • Untrackable Objects: While larger objects can be monitored, millions of smaller fragments—some as small as a paint chip—are untrackable but still pose significant risks.

Objects in orbit travel at speeds exceeding 17,000 miles per hour, making even tiny fragments capable of causing severe damage. For example, a paint chip once left a noticeable pit on the window of the Space Shuttle Challenger.

Low-Earth orbit (LEO), which extends up to about 1,200 miles (2,000 kilometers) above Earth, is the most crowded region. LEO is home to critical infrastructure such as communication satellites, Earth observation systems, and crewed missions like the ISS. A cascading collision event in this region could disrupt essential services like GPS, internet, and weather monitoring.

At higher altitudes, debris remains in orbit for much longer. Objects at altitudes of 500 miles (800 kilometers) could take a century to deorbit naturally, while those in geosynchronous orbit, 22,236 miles (35,786 kilometers) above Earth, may remain for thousands of years. This long-term congestion poses severe challenges for future space exploration and satellite operations.

Efforts to mitigate the risks of space debris focus on two main areas: debris cleanup and improved regulation.

  1. Debris Cleanup: Experimental technologies like drag sails and other deorbiting devices are being tested. For instance, the European Space Agency successfully deployed a drag sail in 2022 to expedite the descent of defunct satellites. However, these methods are costly and have yet to be widely adopted.
  2. Regulation and Policy: While international organizations like the United Nations are discussing frameworks for space traffic management and debris reduction, enforcement mechanisms are limited. Many experts believe that national regulations, particularly from spacefaring nations like the United States, are crucial for fostering responsible behavior in space.

Opinions vary among scientists about whether Kessler Syndrome has already begun. Some argue that the current trajectory of orbital congestion aligns with the syndrome’s early stages, while others find the term too imprecise to describe the present situation. What is clear, however, is that without significant intervention, the risks will continue to escalate.

Written By
Joe Yans